ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate how payers utilize Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) assessments to inform coverage or formulary decisions. Method(s): Double-blinded, web-based survey was fielded through Xcenda's research panel, the Managed Care Network, from June to July 2022. Result(s): A total of 51 payers from health plans (n=27), integrated delivery networks (n=12), and pharmacy benefit managers (n=12) participated in the survey. When assessing the usefulness of ICER's value assessment framework (VAF) to inform formulary decisions within their organizations, 57% of payers indicated it was extremely/very useful, 33% indicated somewhat useful, and 10% indicated not at all/not very useful. Most respondents (73%) agreed that ICER assessments are aligned with their organization's internal assessment. Utilization of ICER's VAF was most prevalent in high-cost drug or disease states (78%), rare/orphan disease states (71%), and oncology/hematology disease states (67%). Payers reported less use in primary care disease states (29%), COVID-19 (8%), and digital therapeutics (4%). In the last 24 months, 20% of payers reported ICER's recommendations often influenced coverage decisions, 59% indicated occasional influence, and 22% indicated no influence. In the last 24 months, payers indicated the top 5 ICER assessments that influenced their coverage decisions included high cholesterol (38%), Alzheimer's disease (36%), atopic dermatitis (33%), multiple myeloma (31%), and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (28%). ICER assessments that were less impactful included beta thalassemia (3%), digital health technologies (3%), and supervised injection facilities (3%). Payers reported using ICER assessments to inform both expanded and restricted coverage decisions. Conclusion(s): Payers find ICER's VAF useful to inform their organization's formulary decisions. ICER's assessments often align with payers' internal assessments and are most frequently utilized for high-cost drugs or disease states. Payers indicate ICER assessments have affected both expansion and restriction in their coverage policies.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Combination of daratumumab (Dara) and lenalidomide (Len) may enhance the function of teclistamab (Tec), potentially resulting in improved antimyeloma activity in a broader population. We present initial safety and efficacy data of Tec-Dara- Len combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 1b study (MajesTEC-2;NCT04722146). Method(s): Eligible patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and immune-modulatory drug, were given weekly doses of Tec (0.72-or- 1.5 mg/kg with step-up dosing) + Dara 1800 mg + Len 25 mg. Responses per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, adverse events (Aes) per CTCAE v5.0, and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per ASTCT guidelines, were assessed. Result(s): 32 patients received Tec-Dara- Len (0.72 mg/kg, n = 13;1.5 mg/kg, n = 19). At data cut-off (11 July 2022), median follow-up (range) was 5.78 months (1.0-10.4) and median treatment duration was 4.98 months (0.10-10.35). Median age was 62 years (38-75);87.5% were male. Median prior LOT was 2 (1-3), 18.8% were refractory to Dara and 28.1% refractory to Len. CRS was most frequent AE (81.3% [n = 26], all grade 1/2), 95% occurred during cycle1. Median time to onset was 2 days (1-8), median duration was 2 days (1-22). No ICANS were reported. Frequent Aes (>=25.0% across both dose levels) were neutropenia (75.0% [n = 24];grade 3/4: 68.8% [n = 22]), fatigue (43.8% [n = 14];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]), diarrhoea (37.5% [n = 12];all grade 1/2), insomnia (31.3% [n = 10];grade 3/4: 3.1% [n = 1]), cough (28.1% [n = 9];all grade 1/2), hypophosphatemia (25.0% [n = 8];all grade 1/2), and pyrexia (25% [n = 8];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]). Febrile neutropenia frequency was 12.5% (n = 4). Infections occurred in 24 patients (75.0%;grade 3/4: 28.1% [n = 9]). Most common were upper respiratory infection (21.9% [n = 7]), COVID-19 (21.9% [n = 7]), and pneumonia (21.9% [n = 7]). Three (9.4%) had COVID-19 pneumonia. One (3.1%) discontinued due to COVID-19 infection and this patient subsequently died of this infection. Overall response rate (ORR, median follow-up) was 13/13 (8.61 months) at 0.72 mg/kg and 13/16 evaluable patients (less mature at 4.17 months) at 1.5 mg/kg. 12 patients attained very good/better partial response at 0.72 mg/kg dose, and response was not mature for 1.5 mg/kg group. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7-2.0). Preliminary pharmacokinetic concentrations of Tec-Dara- Len were similar as seen with Tec monotherapy. Tec-Dara- Len- treatment led to proinflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. Conclusion(s): The combination of Tec-Dara- Len has no new safety signals beyond those seen with Tec or Dara-Len individually. Promising ORR supports the potential for this combination to have enhanced early disease control through the addition of Tec. These data warrant further investigation.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: COVID-19 had an impact on health care, including diagnostics. Early diagnosis of MM is a critical factor for prognosis. We examined the impact of COVID-19 on incidence of NDMM patients and on characteristics in NDMM patients in US and in Germany. Method(s): 44,164 NDMM patients were identified in TriNetX federated network across 55 healthcare organizations in US between January 2018 and December 2021. A bivariate analysis examined changes in patient characteristics in two cohorts before (Cohort 1;n=25513) and after (Cohort 2;n=18.651) the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. 4172 NDMM patients were identified in the German database in a sample of across >100 healthcare organizations in the same time period. Similarly, bivariate analysis examined changes in patient characteristics before (Cohort 1;n=2252) and after (Cohort 2;n=1920) the start of pandemic. Result(s): Analysis of US data showed a significant decrease in incidence of NDMM. Bivariate analysis revealed that NDMM patients in Cohort 2 have a significantly higher risk profile compared with patients in Cohort 1, higher incidence of renal failure (13.5% v. 15.43%), heart failure (10.3% v 11.26%), bone lesions (12.6% v. 13.05%) and anemia (26.8% v. 29.75%). The German data indicated an increased risk profile in Cohort 2, with higher reporting of renal impairment (12.3% v. 15.5%) and cardiac impairment (8.3% v. 10.9%). The higher risk profile was reflected in a significant increase of all SLiM-CRAB criteria, notably hypercalcemia (24.1 % v. 36.9%), bone marrow plasma cell infiltration (28.1% v. 36.8%) and free light chain involvement (27.3% v. 41.3%). Conclusion(s): The results provide real-world evidence of a change in risk profile for patients with NDMM during COVID-19. This higher risk profile is observed in both the US and Germany, and may negatively impact outcomes such as progression-free and five-year overall survival.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The sudden onset of the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic required agile development of standards and efficient validation of assays to assess prevalence of infection as well as immune responses to infection and vaccination. Leveraging their experience in HPV serology and standards, the Vaccine, Immunity and Cancer Directorate (VICD) at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNCLR) pivoted to address this unmet need in SARS-Co-V2 serology clinical testing and research. This standardization effort required the collection and processing of large volumes of blood from SARS-Co-V2 infected and uninfected individuals into serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Collaborations with specimen collection sites across the United States were established. Following qualification for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM levels in independent laboratories, VICD assembled reference evaluation panels, which were used to assist the FDA's performance evaluation of commercial assays submitted for EUA approval. To date, 185 different shipments of the standard or validation panel have been sent to both domestic and international labs. These materials are also available to the SARS-CoV-2 serology community for assay calibration and performance evaluation which greatly facilitates assay data harmonization. In addition, the NCI Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) was born from this initiative and expertise, resulting in the establishment of Capacity Building Centers (CBCs) for sample collection from different healthy, cancer and immunocompromised cohorts at Mount Sinai, Arizona State University, the University of Minnesota, and Northwell Feinstein. The NCI and FNLCR simultaneously collaborated to develop a network of investigators focused on advancing research on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination among diverse and vulnerable populations, including cancer patients. Their research has resulted in over 326 peer-reviewed publications. The CBC's have enrolled patients in longitudinal studies, resulting in a centralized collection of annotated, well characterized serum, PBMCs and clinical data. Numerous cancer cohorts, but predominantly Multiple Myeloma, are included. Furthermore, technology development was supported at the CBC's. Based upon this success, the VICD in collaboration with NCI is pursuing an even more innovative effort in pandemic preparedness to establish a Center for Serology and Data Emergency Preparedness (CESDEP);a global network able to activate and pivot to address pandemic-level threats, while continuing to expand the development of immunological assays that can inform clinical decisions for cancer and other immunocompromised patients.
ABSTRACT
In phase 1 of CC-92480- MM- 001 (NCT03374085), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (MEZI-d) was selected at 1 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here we report preliminary results from the MEZI-d dose-expansion cohort in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Key eligibility criteria were: RRMM;>=3 prior lines of therapy;disease progression <=60 days of last myeloma therapy;refractoriness to lenalidomide/pomalidomide, a proteasome inhibitor, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Oral mezigdomide 1 mg was given on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, plus weekly dexamethasone (40 mg;20 mg if >75 years of age). Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy (overall response rate [ORR]);secondary objectives included safety/tolerability and additional efficacy assessments. Pharmacodynamics was an exploratory objective. As of 16/Sep/2022, 101 patients had received MEZI-d at the RP2D. Median age was 67 (range 42-85) years, median time since initial diagnosis was 7.4 (1.1-37.0) years;39.6% of patients had plasmacytomas and 37/101 patients had high-risk cytogenetics (56/101 not evaluable). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-15);prior therapies included stem cell transplantation (77.2%) and anti-BCMA therapy (29.7%). All patients were refractory to last myeloma regimen and triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.5 (0.5-21.9) months, with a median of 4 (1-20) cycles;10.0% of patients continued treatment;progressive disease was the main reason for discontinuation (60.4%). ORR was 40.6% for all patients. Whilst data are not mature yet, median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI 3.0-5.5) months and median duration of response was 7.6 (95% CI 5.4-9.5) months. ORR was 30.0% in patients with plasmacytomas (N = 40) and 50.0% in patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy (N = 30). Ninety-one (91.1%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (75.2%), anaemia (35.6%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7%);34.7% of patients had grade 3/4 infections, including grade 3/4 pneumonia (15.8%) and COVID-19 (7.0%). Occurrence of other grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low. Due to TEAEs, 76.2% and 29.7% of patients had mezigdomide dose interruptions and reductions, respectively;90.1% of patients discontinued mezigdomide. Mezigdomide induced substrate degradation and increases in activated and proliferating T cells in patients, including those directly refractory to pomalidomide-based therapies. MEZI-d had a manageable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, including patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. These results strongly support the continued development of mezigdomide in MM, and especially in combination.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: A LSR is a systematic review that is continually updated, incorporating new evidence as it becomes available. They are conducted in research areas where new evidence is constantly emerging on diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes. The objective of this study was to understand the current application of LSRs across research areas. Method(s): Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched to identify LSRs. Only the most recent update of a LSR was included. Data regarding the indication, intervention, methods, frequency of updates, and funding were extracted. Result(s): Of the 1,243 records identified, 126 LSRs were included for analysis. The first LSR was published in 2015, with a significant increase in the number of LSRs published starting in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common indication represented by LSRs was COVID-19 (72%), followed by oncology (10%). Other indications with LSRs included chronic pain, traumatic brain injury, and skin disorders, among others. While most oncology LSRs identified interventional randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) (85%), only 54% of COVID-19 LSRs were restricted to interventional studies, including a combination of RCTS and real-world observational studies. Oncology LSRs included common cancers such as prostate, renal, or multiple myeloma. Of the reviews that reported update frequency, 28% planned monthly, 12% yearly, and 12% weekly updates. Only 46% of LSRs were registered. The majority of LSRs were funded by government or research organizations. Objectives of LSRs varied, with most stating the need to maintain up-to-date databases;however, several studies used LSRs to facilitate network meta-analysis or mixed treatment comparisons. Conclusion(s): While LSRs were introduced over five years ago, their frequency increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Apart from COVID-19, LSRs are commonly used in oncology settings. LSRs provide high-level, relevant, and up-to-date evidence, making them a useful tool for clinical and real-world research.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
'You do not know what you will find, you may set out to find one thing and end up discovering something entirely different'-Alexander Fleming As the pace at which medicine is advancing continues to accelerate, haematologists will increasingly find themselves practising unfamiliar medicine and using novel treatments. Whilst most scientific breakthroughs hopefully lead to an overall improvement in quality of life and prognosis, it is imperative that enough attention is paid to the shortcomings of new treatments and adverse events. The recent COVID-19 pandemic is a stark reminder of the cyclical nature of history and the need for healthcare professionals to utilise lessons learnt by our predecessors. Fleming and the discovery of penicillin highlights how mistakes in practice can sometimes lead to unexpected but useful revelations. The use of thalidomide as a treatment for hyperemesis gravidarum in the 1960s devastatingly lead to birth defects in thousands of people. Today, the repurposing of thalidomide, through lateral thinking and further study, has contributed to significant improvements in the prognosis of patients with Multiple Myeloma.1 Mortality following allogenic stem cell transplant continues to decrease overtime as knowledge surrounding complications and how to manage these improves, despite the fact that patients receiving stem cell transplants are becoming increasingly complex.2 These examples from history demonstrate the merit in studying adverse events and undesired outcomes. National reviews of patient health records indicate that errors currently occur in 10% of hospital admissions.3 With new treatments and more complex patients this will likely increase. It is estimated that voluntary reporting by healthcare professionals of such events only occurs 70% of the time.3 History should be used to guide essential changes in attitudes towards error reporting and help to create an ethos where 'failings' are more willingly recognised as a tool to guide improvement and innovation.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 pandemic still pose a substantial threat worldwide despite increasing vaccine availability. Patients with haematological malignancies have been shown to have increased risk of contracting COVID-19 and are more susceptible to develop severe illness from SARS-CoV- 2 infection. The immune response to vaccines is impaired in patients with haematological malignancy due to underlying disease or antineoplastic therapies. The monoclonal-antibody combination, Evusheld is composed of tixagevimab and cilgavimab, two neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV- 2. It has been shown to be safe and have efficacy for the prevention of COVID-19. Our aim of study is to describe the incidence and outcome of breakthrough COVID-19 infection among patients who received Evusheld in our centre and analyse the factors that possibly increase the risk of breakthrough infection. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective review of all adult patients with haematological malignancy who received tixagevimab/ cilgavimab 150/150 mg injection in Hospital Pulau Pinang from 1 July 2022 to 31 August 2022 with a follow-up period to 30 November 2022 was conducted. Demographic data, clinical characteristics and outcome will be retrieved from patient's medical records. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (version 21.0). Result(s): A total of 96 patients (50 males and 46 females) received tixagevimab/cilgavimab injection during the study period with a median age of 61 years (range 19-82). Majority of them were diagnosed with multiple myeloma (42.7%), followed by lymphoma (33.3%) and leukaemia (24%). One third of them had history of therapy with monoclonal antibody and 20% had haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. No major adverse effects of tixagevimab/cilgavimab injection were noted among the study population. Of the 12 patients (12.5%) who had COVID-19 infection, all of them had mild infection;three were asymptomatic and six patients received Paxlovid antiviral therapy. The median time from tixagevimab/cilgavimab to the onset of COVID-19 infection was 35 days (range 5-97 days). The mean age of patients with breakthrough COVID-19 infection were older compared to those without breakthrough infection but was not statistically significant. The incidence of breakthrough COVID-19 infection was not affected by type of haematological malignancy, history of monoclonal antibody therapy or COVID-19 vaccination. Discussion and Conclusion(s): Our findings showed that tixagevimab/cilgavimab was safe and effective in preventing COVID-19- related morbidity and mortality among patients with haematological malignancy during the study period. However, the limitation is the lack of access to whole genome sequencing for detection of resistant variants for breakthrough infections.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Patients with hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma (MM), experience suboptimal responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM) are precursors to MM and exhibit altered immune cell composition and function. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the subsequent population-wide vaccination represent an opportunity to study the real-life immune response to a common antigen. Here, we present updated results from the IMPACT study, a study we launched in November 2020 to characterize the effect of plasma cell premalignancy on response to SARS-CoV2 vaccination (vx). Methods We performed: (i) ELISA for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies on 1,887 peripheral blood (PB) samples (237 healthy donors (HD), and 550 MGUS, 947 SMM, and 153 MM patients) drawn preand post-vx;(ii) single-cell RNA, T cell receptor (TCR), and B cell receptor (BCR) sequencing (10x Genomics) on 224 PB samples (26 HD, and 20 MGUS, 48 SMM, and 24 MM patients) drawn preand post-vx;(iii) plasma cytokine profiling (Olink) on 106 PB samples (32 HD, and 38 MGUS and 36 SMM patients) drawn pre- and post-vx;and (iv) bulk TCR sequencing (Adaptive Biotechnologies) on 8 PB samples from 4 patients (2 MGUS, 2 SMM) drawn pre- and post-vx. Results Patients with MGUS and SMM achieved comparable antibody titers to HD two months post-vx. However, patient titers waned significantly faster, and 4 months post-vx we observed significantly lower titers in both MGUS (Wilcoxon rank-sum, p=0.030) and SMM (p=0.010). These results indicate impaired humoral immune response in patients with MGUS and SMM.At baseline, the TCR repertoire was significantly less diverse in patients with SMM compared to HD (Wilcoxon rank-sum, p=0.039), while no significant difference was observed in the BCR repertoire (p=0.095). Interestingly, a significant increase in TCR repertoire diversity was observed post-vx in patients with SMM (paired t-test, p=0.014), indicating rare T cell clone recruitment in response to vaccination. In both HD and patients, recruited clones showed upregulation of genes associated with CD4+ naive and memory T cells, suggesting preservation of the T cell response in SMM, which was confirmed by bulk TCR-sequencing in 4 patients.Lastly, by cytokine profiling, we observed a defect in IL-1beta and IL-18 induction post-vx in patients with SMM compared to HD (Wilcoxon rank-sum, p=0.047 and p=0.015, respectively), two key monocyte-derived mediators of acute inflammation, suggesting an altered innate immune response as well. Conclusion Taken together, our findings highlight that despite the absence of clinical manifestations, plasma cell premalignancy is associated with defects in both innate and adaptive immune responses. Therefore, patients with plasma cell premalignancy may require adjusted vaccination strategies for optimal immunization.
ABSTRACT
The treatment landscape in myeloma has rapidly changed over the last few years with the advent of an ever increasing number of funded novel therapies. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a paradigm shift in the burden of infection within the community. Clinical trials often exclude older and more comorbid patients and so there is a paucity of data of the effect of infection on patients with myeloma in the 'real world'. We performed a restrospective audit of all patients with myeloma admitted with infection to our level 2b haematology centre over a 3-year period from November 2019 to November 2022. We collected data on patient demographics and characteristics, infection status, microbiology results, length of stay and outcome of admission. During the audit period there were 87 admissions from 52 patients. The median number of admissions per patient was 1 (range 1-6). The median age at admission was 72 (range 41-90). Patients had a median of two major comorbidities (range 0-8). Performance status was <2 in 63% of patients (33/52). In terms of disease characteristics, International Staging Score (ISS) was stage 1 in 12% of patients, stage 2 in 38%, stage 3 in 38% and unavailable in 12%. Revised ISS (R-ISS) was stage 1 in 2% of patients, stage 2 in 44%, stage 3 in 17% and unavailable in 37%. The median line of treatment was 2 (range 0-6). Respiratory tract infection was the most common site of infection in 51% of admissions. Microbiology was negative in over half of infection admissions (50/87). Fifteen per cent (13/87) had a positive COVID-19 PCR. A positive blood culture result was identified in 8% (7/87). The median length of stay was 9 days (range 1-58). The mortality rate of admissions with infection was 17% (15/87). Overall, our real-world results show the continuing burden of infection in myeloma in the era of modern treatment. Despite the omnipresence of the COVID-19 pandemic over the last 2 and a half years, this contributed to only a small number of admissions. Infections happened in patients of all ages and many patients had good performance status, limited comorbidities and intermediate risk disease. The mortality rate of our cohort was surprisingly high at 17%. In summary, infection remains a major complication of myeloma. Given our results we now plan a trial of prophylactic antibiotics for patients on active treatment.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated multiple changes to the format of myeloma clinics to minimise the risk of infection among patients and staff. These included changing in-person clinic appointments to telephone appointments when there was no medical need for face-to- face review and instituting a courier service for delivery of oral or self-administered medications. As COVID-19 restrictions relaxed, we sought to investigate the acceptability of these changes to our patients and to determine which, if any, of the new arrangements should continue. Method(s): Patients who attended the Myeloma Clinic at The Royal Marsden Hospital, both in-person and by telephone, on four separate dates in August and September 2022 were asked to complete a questionnaire to provide their opinions using a combination of multiple-choice, Likert scale and free-text questions. These covered the main domains of change outlined above along with questions about blood test location and attendance with family and friends. Result(s): Questionnaires were returned by 59 patients, 11 relating to in-person appointments and 48 to telephone appointments. 86.0% of patients were in favour of continuing the option of telephone appointments, with many highlighting their convenience and the avoidance of long travel and waiting times, with some also mentioning their COVID-19 security. However, a number of patients expressed concerns including communication difficulties, the inability to effectively assess physical health with an examination and a lack of reassurance. Furthermore, those who attended in-person appointments felt they were very COVID-secure, assigning them a mean of score of 4.5, where 1 was very insecure and 5 very secure. Several suggested that the optimum schedule would include regular telephone appointments with occasional in-person meetings. Interestingly, only 25.5% of patients wanted a video calling option. Patients were also very positive about receiving medications by courier, with 94.1% of patients receiving their medications within two working days of their clinic appointment. 81.8% of patients expressed a wish for this option to continue, highlighting the increased convenience and reduction in waiting times. Conclusion(s): These results suggest that changes made to the Myeloma Clinic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have improved the patient experience. A mixture of telephone and in-person appointments may be preferable for this cohort of patients, many of whom require regular appointments for chemotherapy approval but are medically stable, and whose frailty makes long travel and waiting times challenging. These findings have implications for the planning of myeloma clinics across the UK.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite several studies, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with multiple myeloma remains uncertain. Material(s) and Method(s): We performed a survey that covered the period of the first and second waves of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 23 centers inseven countries. Out of 352 patients with myeloma and SARS-CoV-2, 23% died. Results/Conclusions: Logistic regression showed a lower risk of death among patients treated with proteasome inhibitor and a higher risk of death for those who had a severe or a very severe course of disease.Copyright © 2023 Sciendo. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) proteins play an important role in multiple myeloma (MM) cell survival and represent an attractive therapeutic target. In prior trials, a subgroup analysis of patients with t(11;14)-positive relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM showed the combination of a Bcl-2 inhibitor, a proteasome inhibitor, and dexamethasone improved progression-free survival with no increased mortality. BGB-11417, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, is more potent and selective than venetoclax. BGB-11417- 105 (NCT04973605) is a phase 1b/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of BGB-11417 monotherapy, in combination with dexamethasone, or with dexamethasone+carfilzomib in patients with t(11;14)-positive R/R MM. Preliminary safety results for the combination of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone are presented. Method(s): Eligible patients had t(11;14)-positive R/R MM and had been exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory agent, and anti-CD38 therapy. Patients received 80-, 160-, 320-, or 640-mg BGB-11417 daily with 40-mg dexamethasone weekly until death, intolerability, or disease progression. Dose escalation was guided by a mTPI-2 design and overall review by a safety monitoring committee. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were also assessed. Result(s): As of 1 July 2022, 10 patients were enrolled in the 80-, 160-, and 320-mg (3 patients each) and 640-mg (1 patient) dose-escalation cohorts of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone. The median age was 69 years (range, 52-81) and median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1-5). The median treatment duration was 3.2 months (range, 0.5-6.5). No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level. Three patients died whilst on study: 1 due to COVID-19 complications 157 days after treatment discontinuation (day 208), 1 due to progressive disease 50 days after treatment discontinuation (day 89), and 1 due to COVID-19 whilst on study treatment (day 78). No deaths were associated with study treatment. Two patients experienced Grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). One patient in the 160-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 increase in liver enzymes and lymphopenia. One patient in the 320-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 lymphopenia. The most common TEAEs were insomnia (50%), fatigue (30%), arthralgia (20%), back pain (20%), lymphopenia (20%), and nausea (20%). BGB-11417 exposure increased dose-dependently from 80 mg to 320 mg with high interpatient PK variability. BGB-11417 exposures after single and multiple doses appeared similar, indicating limited accumulation. Conclusion(s): BGB-11417 plus dexamethasone was generally well-tolerated in patients with R/R MM harbouring t(11;14) at doses <=640 mg. Efficacy data are forthcoming. Recruitment is ongoing in the US, Australia, and New Zealand;the BGB-11417, dexamethasone, and carfilzomib combination arm will open in the future.
ABSTRACT
Long-term kinetics of antibody (Ab) and cell-mediated immune (CMI) response to full anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine schedule and booster doses in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients remain unclear. We prospectively evaluated Ab and CMI response to mRNA vaccines in 103 SARS-CoV-2-naïve MM patients (median age 66, 1 median prior line of therapy) and 63 health-workers. Anti-S-RBD IgG (Elecsys®assay) were measured before vaccination and after 1 (T1), 3 (T3), 6 (T6), 9 (T9) and 12 (T12) months from second dose (D2) and 1 month after the introduction of the booster dose (T1D3). CMI response (IGRA test) was evaluated at T3 and T12. Fully vaccinated MM patients displayed high seropositivity rate (88.2%), but low CMI response (36.2%). At T6 the median serological titer was halved (p=0.0391) in MM patients and 35% reduced (p=0.0026) in controls. D3 (94 patients) increased the seroconversion rate to 99% in MM patients and the median IgG titer in both groups (up to 2500 U/mL), maintained at T12. 47% of MM patients displayed a positive CMI at T12 and double-negativity for humoral and CMI (9.6% at T3) decreased to 1%. Anti-S-RBD IgG level ≥346 U/mL showed 20-times higher probability of positive CMI response (OR 20.6, p<0.0001). Hematological response ≥CR and ongoing lenalidomide maintenance enhanced response to vaccination, hindered by proteasome inhibitors/anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. In conclusion, MM elicited excellent humoral, but insufficient cellular responses to anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Third dose improved immunogenicity renewal, even when undetectable after D2. Hematological response and ongoing treatment at vaccination were the main predictive factors of vaccine immunogenicity, emphasizing the role of vaccine response assessment to identify patients requiring salvage approaches.
ABSTRACT
With the appearance of SARS-CoV-2, the range of infections, considered the most common cause of death for people with multiple myeloma, has expanded. Although the omicron variant (PANGO B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2, that dominates the world at the time of manuscript writing, is less likely to cause fatal infection in immunocompetent patients compared to the delta variant (PANGO B.1.617.2), its transmissibility did not decrease. The likelihood of a severe or critical course of COVID-19 in patients with multiple myeloma is increased by the humoral and cellular immunosuppression caused by the malignancy itself, its targeted hematological treatment, and other comorbidities associated with the disease (e.g., chronic kidney failure). Antiviral therapies, monoclonal antibody preparations used as pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis, and possibly convalescent plasma therapy, started as early as possible might prevent the clinical progression of COVID-19. While the incidence of community-acquired co-infections accompanying COVID-19 in the average population is not exceptionally high, in people with multiple myeloma, Streptococcus pneumoniae infection that follows respiratory viral diseases is approximately 150 times more likely to cause invasive disease. As a result of modern oncohematological treatment, multiple myeloma has now become a chronic disease accompanied by relapses, and those affected should be immunized against the above two pathogens. In our manuscript, we describe the case of an adult patient with severe COVID-19 complicated by cytokine storm and invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infection who was diagnosed with de novo multiple myeloma during hospital care, and, finally, we briefly review the related literature data. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(20): 763-769.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Pneumococcal Infections , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Cytokine Release Syndrome/etiology , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , RainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As on March 12, 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Its rapid spread has posed major challenges to the management of health-care systems. Patients with hematological disorders, being immunocompromised in more ways than one, face a lot of challenges. Most of these patients require frequent visits to health-care facilities for transfusion support, infusions, surveillance, and follow-ups, which increase the risk of exposure and hence infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. AIM: We assessed the impact of the pandemic on the decisions of hematologists in Saudi Arabia. Method(s): An online survey was done through questionnaires, to understand the decisions and course of clinical treatments taken. 45 hematologist answered 20-questions structured questionnaires through online link. RESULT(S): The majority of hematologist have used virtual clinics in managing patients and have delayed or canceled well visits. Although some hematologist delayed treatment in stable patients like autologous stem cell transplantation for myeloma patients, the majority did not delay induction or consolidation therapies for patients with leukemia with curative intent plans. CONCLUSION(S): The crisis brought along with it challenges and opportunities to improve patient care through research and clinical practice. Telemedicine was sought for supporting outpatients. Malignancies were taken care of, with due precautions. Observations of decisions of hematologists resulted in the patients still being closely followed up and urgent treatments being attended to. The hematologists expressed satisfaction with the use of telemedicine. Online consultations and monitoring of patients could probably be taken as an alternative resource in such situations.Copyright © 2023 Journal of Applied Hematology Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: IgM Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a rare subtype of MM consisting of <1% cases of MM. It is distinguished from Waldenstrom Macroglobinemia, which also produces IgM, by the absence of somatic mutation MYD88. We present a patient with a chief complaint of diarrhea which unknowingly led to his hematological diagnosis Case Description/Methods: A 64 year old male with RA-SLE overlap syndrome on steroids, and recent COVID19 pneumonia, had presented with 5 episodes of watery diarrhea every day and 40 Ib weight loss within 2 months. CT revealed small bowel enteritis and stool studies, including C. diff, cultures, ova and parasites were negative. Diarrhea persisted despite antibiotics, therefore an EGD and Colonoscopy were performed which showed duodenal lymphangiectasia and a normal colon. Duodenal biopsy revealed eosinophilic deposits in the villous lamina propria which stained for IgM and stained negative under congo red ruling out amyloidosis. SPEP and a bone marrow biopsy revealed monoclonal IgMspikes and plasma cells in the bone marrow suggesting MMalong with a co-existing population of CLL. Next-generation sequencing was negative forMYD88, supporting IgM MM instead of Waldenstrom. He developed a protein-losing enteropathy with dramatic hypoalbuminemia (albumin 0.9) and lower extremity edema and DVTs. He was started on chemotherapy and frequent albumin infusions. His diarrhea completely resolved, however not in time, as his other medical comorbidities lagged behind and he developed anasarca and continued to deteriorate. Discussion(s): Plasma cell dyscrasias such as IgM MM or more commonly Waldenstrom have rarely been reported to cause GI symptoms. GI involvement can include direct GI infiltration of plasma cells, IgM deposition, or the finding of a plasmacytoma. It has been speculated that IgM deposits can lead to interstitial viscosity and obstructive lymphangiectasia leading to diarrhea and a protein-losing enteropathy as in our patient. Protein loss has led him to have hypoalbuminemia and possibly loss of antithrombotic proteins that have caused DVTs. Few case reports have suggested that treating the underlying cause with chemotherapy stops diarrhea entirely. Although our patient's diarrhea ceased, we believe that it was not in time for him to entirely recover from the later complications of the disease. We hope that this case can help clinicians to attempt prompt treatment of patients when they find GI specimens showing IgM deposits and they suspect a plasma cell dyscrasia.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: To examine the effects of modern second-generation novel agent therapy on immune cell subsets, in particular CD4+-T-cells, and infectious complications in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), we conducted a prospective cohort study in 112 RRMM patients. Results: Substantially decreased CD4+-T-cells <200/µl before initiation of relapse therapy were detected in 27.7% of patients and were associated with a higher number of previous lines of therapy. Relapse therapy with carfilzomib or pomalidomide showed a significant further decrease of CD4+-T-cells. All novel agents led to a significant decrease of B-cell counts. Overall, infections were frequent with 21.3% of patients requiring antibacterial therapy within the first 3 months of relapse therapy, 5.6% requiring hospitalization. However, in the setting of standard antimicrobial prophylaxis in RRMM patients with very low CD4+-T-cells, no significant association of CD4+T-cell count and an increased risk of infection could be detected. Discussion: Our findings imply that reduced CD4+-T-cell numbers and infections are common in patients with RRMM. We also demonstrate an association with the number of previous therapies and certain substances suggesting an increased need for personalized prophylaxis strategies for opportunistic infections in this patient cohort.